<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Private Valuations</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.privatevaluations.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.privatevaluations.com</link>
	<description>Answers You Need – When You Need Them</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 20:31:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>DEAD or ALIVE? The Commercial Real Estate market</title>
		<link>http://www.privatevaluations.com/2010/09/27/dead-or-alive-the-commercial-real-estate-market/</link>
		<comments>http://www.privatevaluations.com/2010/09/27/dead-or-alive-the-commercial-real-estate-market/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2010 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mick Gamache</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Strategic Planning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.privatevaluations.dreamhosters.com/?p=123</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>There has been a worldwide recession.&#160; There will also be a worldwide recovery.&#160; </p> <p>The July/August issue of the Jones Lang LaSalle Global Market Perspective provides us some interesting insights.&#160; Perhaps the pessimism that currently dominates the equity and commercial real estate markets needs to be tempered.&#160; The J.L.L. report points out that global <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://www.privatevaluations.com/2010/09/27/dead-or-alive-the-commercial-real-estate-market/">DEAD or ALIVE? The Commercial Real Estate market</a></span>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There has been a worldwide recession.&#160; There will also be a worldwide recovery.&#160; </p>
<p>The July/August issue of the Jones Lang LaSalle <a href="http://www.joneslanglasalle.com/Pages/Global-Property-Sustainability-Perspective.aspx">Global Market Perspective</a> provides us some interesting insights.&#160; Perhaps the pessimism that currently dominates the equity and commercial real estate markets needs to be tempered.&#160; The J.L.L. report points out that global commercial real estate investment volumes totaled US$130 billion at mid-year.&#160; The full year total is expected to reach US$300 billion.&#160; This would be a healthy 40-50% increase over 2009.&#160; <a name="more"></a></p>
<p>The report also points out that “the global economy continues to expand and growth is likely to be strong over the short-term.&#160; Economic policy is still expansionary in most major economies, corporate cash flows are strong, activity continues to be boosted by the turn in the inventory cycle and the world trade multiplier is working on the upside. The IMF (International Monetary Fund)recently raised its <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&amp;sid=a7K52bQpLFRA">global growth forecast</a> for 2010 to 4.6% which, after growth of 3% in 2008 and a contraction of 0.6% in 2009, would represent the biggest global economic expansion since 2007.”&#160; </p>
<p>To be sure, the recovery here in the U.S. is proceeding more slowly than we would like.&#160; Even so, commercial real estate investment was US$16.2 billion in the second quarter of 2010, 41% over the first quarter and 408% ahead of the same quarter last year.&#160; </p>
<p>The Jones Lang LaSalle <a href="http://www.joneslanglasalle.com/Pages/Global-Property-Sustainability-Perspective.aspx">Global Market Perspective report</a> is well worth reading. </p>
<p>Mick Gamache </p>
<p><a href="mailto:Agamache@PrivateValuations.com">Agamache@PrivateValuations.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.privatevaluations.com/2010/09/27/dead-or-alive-the-commercial-real-estate-market/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Depreciation Bonus 50% – Buy Equipment Now!</title>
		<link>http://www.privatevaluations.com/2010/09/13/new-depreciation-bonus-50-%e2%80%93-buy-equipment-now/</link>
		<comments>http://www.privatevaluations.com/2010/09/13/new-depreciation-bonus-50-%e2%80%93-buy-equipment-now/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2010 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chic Hendricks</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tax Planning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.privatevaluations.dreamhosters.com/?p=125</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Thanks to our friends at Bank of America Merrill lynch;</p> <p>There is significant tax incentive out there to buy equipment this 4th Quarter.&#160; The after tax cost of acquiring and financing a new asset is less in the 4th quarter than any other time, due to the timing of the after tax cash flows. <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://www.privatevaluations.com/2010/09/13/new-depreciation-bonus-50-%e2%80%93-buy-equipment-now/">New Depreciation Bonus 50% – Buy Equipment Now!</a></span>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em><font color="#4f81bd">Thanks to our friends at Bank of America Merrill lynch;</font></em></p>
<p>There is significant tax incentive out there to buy equipment this 4th Quarter.&#160; The after tax cost of acquiring and financing a new asset is less in the 4th quarter than any other time, due to the timing of the after tax cash flows. The Small Business Jobs Act of 2010 was signed into law on September 27, 2010.&#160; Included in this bill is the extension of “Bonus” depreciation and a temporary increase and extension of Section 179 expensing limits. </p>
<p>The Act provides for 50% bonus depreciation on eligible equipment placed in service in 2010, substantially accelerating the normal MACRS depreciation profile, and resulting in increased economic benefits.&#160;&#160; Most of the asset cost is deducted 4th quarter for this tax year. For example:</p>
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="2" width="573" align="center">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="166" align="center">
<p><strong>Equipment Cost</strong></p>
</td>
<td valign="top" width="166" align="center">
<p><strong>Standard 5-yr MACRS</strong></p>
</td>
<td valign="top" width="239" align="center">
<p><strong>50% Bonus Depreciation Plus Standard Depreciation on Balance</strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="166">
<p>$1,000,000</p>
</td>
<td valign="top" width="166">
<p>$200,000</p>
</td>
<td valign="top" width="239">
<p><b>$600,000</b> (50% Bonus Depreciation of $500,000 + normal 1st year 5-yr MACRS of $100,000 on remaining balance)</p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table></div>
<p>In lieu of depreciation, if you are a small business taxpayer you may qualify to expense the cost of qualified capital assets (property) your company purchases in the year the assets are placed in service, within certain limits.&#160; For 2010 and 2011, the bill temporarily increases the first-year write-off for business equipment from $250,000 to $500,000.&#160; The eligible expenditures cap that triggers a phase-out of the incentive has been raised from $800,000 to $2 million, and the bill expands Section 179 to cover improvements to some real property. </p>
<div align="center">
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="2" width="499" align="center">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="167">
<p align="center"><strong>Section 179 Legislation</strong></p>
</td>
<td valign="top" width="126">
<p align="center"><strong>First-year </strong><strong>write-off</strong></p>
</td>
<td valign="top" width="204">
<p align="center"><strong>Incentive phase-out cap </strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="168">
<p align="center">SBJA (2010-2011)</p>
</td>
<td valign="top" width="126">
<p align="center">$500,00</p>
</td>
<td valign="top" width="204">
<p align="center">$2,000,000</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="168">
<p align="center">ARRA (2009)</p>
</td>
<td valign="top" width="126">
<p align="center">$250,000</p>
</td>
<td valign="top" width="204">
<p align="center">$800,000</p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table></div>
<p><b><i></i></b></p>
<p><b><i>Brian L. Cornay, Vice President</i></b>     <br /><b><i>Bank of America Merrill Lynch        <br />Global Commercial Banking</i></b>     <br /><b><i>WA1-501-36-12        <br />800 Fifth Avenue, 36th Fl         <br />Seattle, Wa&#160; 98104-3176         <br /></i></b><b><i>Phone&#160;&#160;&#160; 206-358-3519        </i></b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.privatevaluations.com/2010/09/13/new-depreciation-bonus-50-%e2%80%93-buy-equipment-now/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Changes to the Accredited Investor Definition</title>
		<link>http://www.privatevaluations.com/2010/08/30/changes-to-the-accredited-investor-definition/</link>
		<comments>http://www.privatevaluations.com/2010/08/30/changes-to-the-accredited-investor-definition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chic Hendricks</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Strategic Planning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.privatevaluations.dreamhosters.com/?p=124</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank Act) became law on July 21, 2010.&#160; One important impact of the Dodd-Frank Act is an immediate change to the definition of &#34;accredited investor&#34; under the Securities Act of 1933 and Rule 501 of Regulation D.&#160; Those companies and individuals involved in private placements <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://www.privatevaluations.com/2010/08/30/changes-to-the-accredited-investor-definition/">Changes to the Accredited Investor Definition</a></span>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank Act) became law on July 21, 2010.&#160; One important impact of the Dodd-Frank Act is an immediate change to the definition of &quot;accredited investor&quot; under the Securities Act of 1933 and Rule 501 of Regulation D.&#160; Those companies and individuals <a name="more"></a>involved in private placements of securities should pay particular attention to the change.    </p>
<p>Companies raising capital by issuing securities often rely on the federal Rule 506 exemption under Regulation D and limit the offering to &quot;accredited investors.&quot;&#160; The exemption allows companies to avoid heightened state regulation as well as the burden of providing more detailed written disclosure to non-accredited investors as a condition to a registration exemption.&#160; Although there are several standards to determine whether an investor is accredited, many individuals rely on the $1,000,000 minimum net worth category to establish their status as accredited investors.&#160; Prior to the Dodd-Frank Act, the net worth calculation could include the value of his or her primary residence.&#160; <b>The Dodd-Frank Act modified the definition of accredited investor (as it relates to natural persons) to exclude the value of the investor&#8217;s primary residence from the $1,000,000 net worth calculation.</b>    </p>
<p>What about the liability of a corresponding mortgage?&#160; According to recent guidance from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the amount of any mortgage or other debt secured by the primary residence (up to its fair market value) may also be excluded from the net worth calculation.&#160; If, however, the indebtedness secured by the residence exceeds the value of the home, the excess should be considered a liability and deducted in determining the investor&#8217;s net worth.   </p>
<p>The change to the accredited investor definition effectively increased the net worth requirement for many investors, effective July 21, 2010.&#160; Issuers and investors should pay close attention to the accredited investor provisions in their offering and subscription documents and may need to modify them to reflect this change.   <br />Further changes to the accredited investor definition may be on the horizon.&#160; The Dodd-Frank Act directs the SEC, beginning in 2014, to adjust the net worth standard to &quot;more than $1,000,000,&quot; leaving the specific amount to the discretion of the SEC.&#160; The SEC also must undertake a review of the entire definition of accredited investor (as it applies to natural persons) at least once every four years thereafter, and is directed to make adjustments as it deems appropriate for the protection of investors, in the public interest, and in light of the economy.</p>
<p>Should you have any questions about the application of the Dodd-Frank Act to your business, or any other corporate-related matter, please do not hesitate to contact us.</p>
<hr align="center" size="2" width="100%" />
<p>The <a href="http://www.icebase.com/go2.shtml?BAh2Tj6K5B2MmMj2/b96890d330fed806/60008cfa73a58f02/chic@privateequityservicesllc.com"><b>Riddell Williams Corporate Group</b></a> advises owners, directors and officers of public and private entities on their legal roles and responsibilities. We help clients raise capital, secure debt and manage and execute transactions. We provide expertise in entity formation, management structures, buy-sell arrangements, negotiation of vendor and supplier arrangements, distribution and franchising agreements and asset and equity transfers, including a broad range of merger and acquisition services.</p>
<p>Riddell Williams P.S.   <br />1001 Fourth Avenue, Suite 4500    <br />Seattle, WA&#160; 98154-1192</p>
<p>Telephone:&#160; 206.624.3600   <br />Facsimile:&#160; 206.389.1708    <br /><a href="http://www.icebase.com/go2.shtml?BAh2Tj6K5B2MmMj2/402ea3814df3be1c/60008cfa73a58f02/chic@privateequityservicesllc.com"><b>www.riddellwilliams.com</b></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.privatevaluations.com/2010/08/30/changes-to-the-accredited-investor-definition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2010 Commercial Real Estate Market – U.S. averages</title>
		<link>http://www.privatevaluations.com/2010/08/16/2010-commercial-real-estate-market-%e2%80%93-u-s-averages/</link>
		<comments>http://www.privatevaluations.com/2010/08/16/2010-commercial-real-estate-market-%e2%80%93-u-s-averages/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chic Hendricks</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Strategic Planning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.privatevaluations.dreamhosters.com/?p=122</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Apartment occupancy is forecasted to drop to a cyclical low of 91.7% in 2010 from 94.3% in 2007, which represents a 2.8% decrease and is less severe than the previous apartment cycle. In the 2000-2004 cycle, the cyclical low of 93.3% represented a peak to trough drop in occupancy of 3.6%.&#160; Effective apartment rents <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://www.privatevaluations.com/2010/08/16/2010-commercial-real-estate-market-%e2%80%93-u-s-averages/">2010 Commercial Real Estate Market – U.S. averages</a></span>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Apartment occupancy</strong> is forecasted to drop to a cyclical low of 91.7% in 2010 from 94.3% in 2007, which represents a 2.8% decrease and is less severe than the previous apartment cycle. In the 2000-2004 cycle, the cyclical low of 93.3% represented a peak to trough drop in occupancy of 3.6%.&#160; Effective apartment rents are forecasted to rise to $1,030/unit in 2010 from $1,027/unit in 2007, which is an 8% decrease after adjusting for inflation. This is less than the 15.9% inflation adjusted decrease observed in the 2000 to 2004 period.     </p>
<p><strong>Office occupancy</strong> is forecasted to drop to a cyclical low of 81.9% in 2010 from 87.4% in 2007, which represents a 6.3% decrease and is less severe than the last office cycle. In the 1980 to 1986 cycle, the cyclical low of 80.7% represented a peak to trough drop in occupancy of 13.2%, which was largely driven by excess supply.&#160; Office rents are forecasted to drop to $21.26/sf in 2010 from $24.59/sf in 2007, which is a 20.7% decrease after adjusting for inflation. This is modestly higher than the 19.5% inflation adjusted decrease observed in the 1980 to 1986 period.     <br /><a name="more"></a>    <br /><strong>Industrial occupancy</strong> is forecasted to drop to a cyclical low of 88% in 2010 from 90.5% in 2007, which is a 2.8% decrease and is less severe than the last industrial cycle. In the 1980-1987 cycle, the cyclical low of 89.4% represented a peak to trough drop in occupancy of 3.7%.&#160; Industrial rents are forecasted to drop to $4.33/sf in 2010 from $4.7/sf in 2007, which is a 15.5% decrease after adjusting for inflation. This is greater than the 11.6% inflation adjusted decrease observed in the 1980 to 1987 period.     </p>
<p><strong>Retail Occupancy</strong> is forecasted to drop to a cyclical low of 87.5% in 2011 from 92.5% in 2007, which represents a 5.4% decrease and is more severe than the previous retail cycle. In the 1980-1987 cycle, the cyclical low of 89.6% represented a peak to trough drop in occupancy of 3.8%&#160; Retail rents are forecasted to drop to a $16.21/sf in 2011 from $18.58/sf in 2007, which is a 15.4% decrease after adjusting for inflation. This is more than the 13.7% inflation adjusted decrease observed in the 1980 to 1987 period.     </p>
<p><strong>Hotel Occupancy</strong> has declined by 8.6%, which is worse than the 6.5% drop in the 2000-2003 cycle. Occupancy is expected to stabilize in 2010, and should start growing in 2011.&#160; ADR (Average Daily Rate) has dropped by about 9%, and is forecasted to drop slightly further, which is worse than the 5% decrease in the 2000–2003 cycle.&#160; RevPAR (defined as ADR × Occupancy) has declined by 16.7%, which is worse than the 10.3% drop in RevPAR during the 2000–2003 cycle. RevPAR may decline further before stabilizing in 2011. The drop in occupancy has been about the same for Full and Limited Service hotels. However, ADR declines have been much more pronounced in the luxury sector.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.privatevaluations.com/2010/08/16/2010-commercial-real-estate-market-%e2%80%93-u-s-averages/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sale of income producing assets vs. the 2010 Economy</title>
		<link>http://www.privatevaluations.com/2010/08/02/sale-of-income-producing-assets-vs-the-2010-economy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.privatevaluations.com/2010/08/02/sale-of-income-producing-assets-vs-the-2010-economy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chic Hendricks</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Strategic Planning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.privatevaluations.dreamhosters.com/?p=121</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Today is no different for the sale of a profitable enterprise than it was 2 or 3 years ago. If you had sold the asset 3 years ago for net $15,000,000, you would have taken paper in the form of warrants or whatever along with cash and maybe royalties. You would have parked most <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://www.privatevaluations.com/2010/08/02/sale-of-income-producing-assets-vs-the-2010-economy/">Sale of income producing assets vs. the 2010 Economy</a></span>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today is no different for the sale of a profitable enterprise than it was 2 or 3 years ago. If you had sold the asset 3 years ago for net $15,000,000, you would have taken paper in the form of warrants or whatever along with cash and maybe royalties. You would have parked most of the cash in an interest bearing account of some sort. So, considering all that&#8217;s happened in the past few years since you hypothetically sold out, what would you have left and what would it be worth?&#160; Get the point? </p>
<p>No matter if you have all your cash in gold, stocks, private investment, or income producing assets of whatever sort &#8211; it&#8217;s still very much at risk. Converting assets today will give you the control and satisfaction that you&#8217;re seeking &#8211; right now!&#160; A bird in the hand so to speak!&#160; It&#8217;s at risk whether you control it or someone else does. The real difference is if you put it at risk and lose it &#8211; you&#8217;ve made the choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.privatevaluations.com/2010/08/02/sale-of-income-producing-assets-vs-the-2010-economy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intangibles</title>
		<link>http://www.privatevaluations.com/2010/07/05/intangibles/</link>
		<comments>http://www.privatevaluations.com/2010/07/05/intangibles/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2010 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chic Hendricks</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Valuation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.privatevaluations.dreamhosters.com/?p=119</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Valuation depends on accuracy and diligence. If your analyst isn&#8217;t paying close attention, and doesn&#8217;t ask the right questions, the addition of intangible items can escape them. Intangibles can be created without the thought of doing so. </p> <p>With business competition as fierce as it is today in 2010, management should always stay up <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://www.privatevaluations.com/2010/07/05/intangibles/">Intangibles</a></span>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Valuation depends on accuracy and diligence. If your analyst isn&#8217;t paying close attention, and doesn&#8217;t ask the right questions, the addition of intangible items can escape them. Intangibles can be created without the thought of doing so. </p>
<p>With business competition as fierce as it is today in 2010, management should always stay up to date with intangibles by keeping internal inventory on all that fits or could possibly fit this mysterious category.     </p>
<p>Intangibles can easily escape the&#160; proficiency of the most capable Executive or Owner not to mention the analyst who&#8217;s focused on hard assets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.privatevaluations.com/2010/07/05/intangibles/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sustainability in Value</title>
		<link>http://www.privatevaluations.com/2010/06/19/sustainability-in-value/</link>
		<comments>http://www.privatevaluations.com/2010/06/19/sustainability-in-value/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2010 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chic Hendricks</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Strategic Planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Valuation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.privatevaluations.dreamhosters.com/?p=120</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>It all depends on knowing&#160; your target audience. Who&#8217;s buying from you? Don&#8217;t let your biggest customer put you out of business. Try to keep them at no larger than 35% of your entire revenue stream.</p> <p>Who are your most important customers, clients or prospects, and why? Know what is important to them and <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://www.privatevaluations.com/2010/06/19/sustainability-in-value/">Sustainability in Value</a></span>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It all depends on knowing&#160; your target audience. Who&#8217;s buying from you? Don&#8217;t let your biggest customer put you out of business. Try to keep them at no larger than 35% of your entire revenue stream.</p>
<p>Who are your most important customers, clients or prospects, and why? Know what is important to them and address their needs each month if you can. Find some way to reach out to them. </p>
<p>When recapitalizing an income producing asset, or financing for acquisition, the structure of the finance package is as important as the principal and interest rate plus costs. It can have an adverse effect on sustainability if your finance costs are to much and your lending structure is onerous to your balance sheet. </p>
<p>Work on structure and negotiate the fees! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.privatevaluations.com/2010/06/19/sustainability-in-value/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
